Containers downtown raise a question of fairness in Prince Rupert

Prince Rupert city council has opened a can of worms with its most recent discussion about containers in the downtown core.

Prince Rupert city council has opened a can of worms with its most recent discussion about containers in the downtown core, perhaps creating more questions than providing answers or clarity.

First question: Are containers a useful means of storage for business or an eyesore that detracts from some of the work done to beautify the community? You can paint all the murals you want and add a splash of colour to formerly dull buildings until the cows come home, but if those projects are done across the street from a giant metal box the effect is completely lost.  And if you allow one set of containers downtown, you’re not going to be able to stop the proliferation of containers as businesses recognize their usefulness in a tight downtown core.

Next question: Why business friendly, but not dog friendly? You can’t tell a family you’re not willing to change the bylaws to accommodate one extra dog then turn around and say bylaws need to be changed to accommodate containers that are clearly not permitted by those same bylaws. What is good for families should be good for business and fairness is key.

And the final question: Do you really want to breed a culture where council backs down from their bylaws when someone breaks them and are caught doing so? Council told the family that built a backyard rink so the neighbourhood children could safely play hockey in the great outdoors that the structure had to go because it was built without following the city’s bylaws ­­— that is what is known as precedent. To allow a business that does something in the face of the city’s bylaws without first talking to council sets another precedent: That businesses in town can get away with things people in town cannot.

Council has really backed themselves into a corner when it comes to the issue of allowing containers to stay in the downtown, and I am sure those residents who have been on the opposite side of the fence and were told “the bylaws are the bylaws” will be watching with a keen eye as to how the city responds.

Just Posted

‘The tsunami alarm failed my household’: North Coast residents concerned over sirens, alerts

People living in northern communities share how they learned about Tuesday’s tsunami warning

UPDATE: Tsunami warning causes evacuations, closures throughout North Coast

Emergency BC issued the warning after a 7.9 earthquake off Alaska early Tuesday morning

Senior boys make it to the finals in Victoria

The Senior Rainmakers went 3-1 against the provinces top AAA and AAAA squads

Web Poll: How did you hear about the Tsunami?

A Tsunami warning was issued after a 7.9 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Alaska

Raiders claim the crown in Terrace

The Prince Rupert Adventure Paving Raiders went 3-0 in the Terrace Classic

Testing the Google Arts & Culture app

Going face to face with art

Carriers wanted for the Northern View

We have open routes for carriers all over Prince Rupert

Snowboarder dies at Vancouver Island ski resort

Death at Mount Washington Alpine Resort

Man faces 48 charges in string of random Toronto shootings

The string of unprovoked shootings began Jan.9, say police

‘Shape of Water’ producer, Christopher Plummer among Canadian Oscar nominees

Guillermo del Toro film about merman romance earns 13 nominations

Canada, TPP agrees to revised deal without the United States

Canada and the remaining members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership have agreed to a revised trade agreement

Tsunami warnings 101: Canada

Here are some things to know about tsunami alerts in Canada and how they work

Rogers Media cuts ties with Vice Canada

Rogers Media and Vice Canada are ending their three-year-old partnership, pulling Viceland TV channel off the air

Most Read